![hdr efex pro vs photomatix hdr efex pro vs photomatix](https://neunzehn72.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Photomatix4.jpg)
- #HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX FULL#
- #HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX SOFTWARE#
- #HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX TRIAL#
- #HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX FREE#
However, I would still give a slight nod overall to Photomatix in terms of functionality and ease of use. And I am equally certain they are correct. I'm sure some people will point out that I haven't practicedĮnough with NIK HDR Efex to make getting the more natural look in an
#HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX SOFTWARE#
To PhotoMatix with ACDSee without converting them to Tiffs or jpgs.īoth the HDR Efex and PhotoMatix software could function as externalĮditors or as Photoshop plugins with ACDSee's bit mapped editor tab. I was unable to get NIK to accept the raw image, the only way IĬould get it to work was to convert the raw to tiff files in ACDSeeīefore sending them to HDR Efex. I suspect this difference is a result of Google not actively developing HDR Efex for the last few years and thereby not keeping up with changing tastes in HDR, while Photomatix has done so with its products. Not surprisingly, Photomatix Pro 5 made me work a tiny bit harder (though not significantly so) to get strong dramatic tone-mapping. Super tone mapped, over the top photos many people like. That being said, NIK made it very easy to get those I spent about the same amount of time on each composite photo.įrom my basic determination, I would say, that Photomatix is a bitĮasier to use, especially if one is looking for extremely natural This is one of my pet peeves, I hate, absolutely HATE losing the EXIF data when photos come back from a round trip to an external editor. And to make matters worse, NIK also stripped significant Exif dataįrom the final photo image. Also note the rock at the lower right, I've I like it well enough,īut I see the sky and and the overhang of the dome starting to look a This first HDR image, below, is from NIK HDR Efex. Click on the photos to make them appear larger The source photos were taken with an Olympus E-M10 in HDR 5 photo burst Please remember, I am not an HDR expert, and have minimal I used the same source photos shotĪt Hamilton Pool near Austin Texas, and tried to get them to look as
#HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX FREE#
However, HDR Efex is probably the best FREE HDR software option out there right now (and I tried a LOT of them!), and you can get natural results with it, you just have to work a bit harder, I think. I don't think it is quite as easy to get natural results with NIK HDR Efex as it is with Photomatix. Mapped, more natural looking photos, as I am. I think Photomatix is simplyĮasier to use, particularly if you are interested in the less tone That being said, after using it a bit, I think I would also Certainly its little quirks are quite forgivable considering it is now free. It is certainly an excellent tool with which
![hdr efex pro vs photomatix hdr efex pro vs photomatix](https://www.culturedkiwi.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Aurora-HDR-vs-Photomatix-Pro.jpg)
HDR Efex had been available for free, I probably would not have In all honesty, if, when I decided I wanted to explore HDR, NIK During that 3 week stay, Google announced that they were releasing the NIK Tools 'out into the wild'. Pool, near Austin, and shoot some HDR sequences for a proper test of
#HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX TRIAL#
I believe that you can download a free trial of "Merge to 32-bit" Lightroom plugin, you should give it a try.Talk about bad timing! I bought Photomatix Pro 5 the day before I left for a 3 week visit to Texas. Photoshop does the best job of alignment, but Photoshop is the slowest way to a 32-bit file, the Photoshop 32-bit files are twice the size, & Photoshop will cost you $10 a month for the rest of your life. Usually it does just fine, but sometimes not. For me it's weakness is in aligning the bracketed images. Now of course it's not perfect, nothing is. Highlights that appear to be blown-out to pure white and shadows that look blocked-up to pure black will become easily recoverable.
#HDR EFEX PRO VS PHOTOMATIX FULL#
Moreover, because your now using a full 32-bit TIFF, all those "usual Lightroom developing adjustments" will have a TREMENDOUS amount more latitude & range! For example Lightroom's "Exposure" slider will be adjustable to +/- 10 instead of the standard adjustment range of +/- 5. Using the "Merge to 32-bit" plugin you do ALL the developing in Lightroom where you are familiar (or should be) with all the usual Lightroom developing adjustments.